-
-
$
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
The paper and pen (manual) method of writing
examination, which has been in existence for decades, may not be fascinating
for use because of the problems usually experienced, which include examination
venue capacity constraints, lack of comfort for examination candidates, delay
in the release of results, examination malpractices, cost implication of
printing examination materials and human error. One of the benefits stated for computer-based assessment is that, it
can improve student performance in summative assessments. With the series of
research paper work by Ricketts & Wilks suggested
that the students’ performance improved dramatically when they were not
required to scroll through the question paper, because. The students may be
disadvantaged by the introduction of online assessment, unless care is taken
with the student assessment interface, we have shown that the
introduction of online assessment resulted in a drop in student performance
between two cohorts of students, a few students felt that online examinations
were more stressful or had disadvantaged them, because they hate computers (Ricketts & Wilks, 2001). This is in line with the comments of
Brosnan (1999) about computer anxiety affecting performance. However, it is
interesting to note that dyslexic students found the online examination an
advantage. A number of other students remarked that this format was less
stressful than other exams.
This brings about the need for automation of the examination
system. Over the years, there have been various automated examination systems
that have been developed with one or more limitations. Some of these
limitations include lack of scalability, near-reliability, lack of robustness,
lack of flexible timing functionality to automatically log-off candidates upon
expiration of allotted time as a challenge (Ipaye, 2009); malpractice due to
questions not randomly generated (Ayo et al, 2007); not well secured
application domain in terms of data security and integrity (Levy & Ramim,
2007); most existing computer based test (CBT) systems are deployed as
stand-alone applications that run on distributed networks making access to such
applications restricted to the networked geographical domain and are only suited
for the application environment only (Huszti & Petho, 2008). As such, no
unified development model exists and this alone undermines the success of the e-examination
platform for real-time adoption in practice. There is no way one can talk of computer based assessment without
emphasizing on information and communication technology. By implication one
could refer computer based assessment (CBA) as technology based assessment
(TBA). Meanwhile Information-Communication Technology (ICT) offers so
many outstanding possibilities for teaching and learning that its application
has been growing steadily in every segment of education. Within the general
trends of the utilization of ICT in education, technology-based assessment
(TBA) represents a rapidly increasing share. Several traditional assessment
processes can be carried out more efficiently by means of computers. In
addition, technology offers new assessment methods that cannot be otherwise
realized. It is without doubt that TBA or CBA will replace paper-based testing
in most of the traditional assessment scenarios, and technology will further
extend the territories of assessment in education, as it provides frequent and
precise feedback for the participants in learning and teaching that cannot be
achieved by any other means. Also these will enable the teachers to evaluate
the speed versus power ability of the learners. The speed test given to
learners produces correct answers to questions in the presence of familiar
questions but with limited time. Whole the power test enables then students to
use their previous knowledge to solve difficult and unfamiliar questions in the
presence of unlimited time.
Computer based assessment (CBA) fully represents computer base
technology (CBT) and technology based assessment (TBA) and an overview of the
historical background of the early 2000s, much has occurred in CBT. CBT seems
to have advantages over paper and pencil testing, both for states that run the
assessment programs and for the students who participate in them. These advantages
are recognized by the U.S. Department of Education, which in one of its major
initiatives (Race to the Top Assessment Program), encouraged the development of
CBT. There currently is strong interest in CBT and advocates have identified
many positive merits of this approach to assessment including: efficient
administration, student preference, self-selection options for students,
improved writing performance, built-in accommodations, immediate results,
efficient item development, increased authenticity, and the potential to shift
focus from assessment to instruction (e.g., Becker, 2006; Salend, 2009;
Thompson et al., 2002). CBT also allows new ways of assessing students that
move beyond the traditional multiple choice and constructed response items. For
example, innovative assessments are now being developed that enable students
to manipulate data and role play. Yet, as states move forward with CBT they are
discovering that it is important to consider not only the positive benefits,
but also potential negative unintended consequences. These include, for
example, the possibility that additional training will be needed for students
with disabilities to interact successfully with computers and the challenges of
determining the best way to present some accommodations such as screen readers.
Performance assessments have been an
integral part of educational systems in numerous countries however they have
not been fully integrated in assessment systems in this country. Research has
shown that the format of the assessment affects the type of thinking and
reasoning skills that are used by students, with performance assessments being
better suited to assessing high level, complex thinking skills. Recent advances
in the design and scoring of performance assessments, including computer-based
task simulations and automated scoring systems, support their increased use in
large-scale assessment programs. There are also promising technical advances
that support their use. The educational benefit of using performance assessments
has been demonstrated by a number of researchers. When students are given the
opportunity to work on meaningful, real world tasks in instruction, students
have demonstrated improved performance on performance assessments. Sound
educational practice calls for the alignment among curriculum, instruction and
assessment, and there is ample evidence to support the use of performance
assessments in both instruction and assessment to improve student learning for
all students.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The
two types of CBTs are linear and adaptive, whereby a linear test is a
full-length examination in which the computer selects different questions for
individuals without considering their performance level. It consists of a full
range of test questions-from easiest to most difficult-but not always in that
order. The linear test is scored in the same way as a paper-based test. A
computer adaptive test is one in which the computer selects the range of
questions based on individuals‟
performance level. These questions are taken from a very large pool of possible
questions categorized by content and difficulty. When you take a paper-based
test, you will find that you are asked to answer questions ranging from easy to
hard. In a computer-based adaptive test, each test-taker receives questions
that are at the right level of difficulty for his or her ability. These tests
begin with a question that is of medium level of difficulty for most test
takers. After each question is answered, the computer uses the answer and all
previous answers to determine which question will be answered next. The next
question is one that best follows the previous performance. This means that
different test takers-even in the same
room on the same day-will receive different questions. Since adaptive test
questions are selected according to performance on previous questions, less
time is spent than on a paper-based test on questions that are either too easy
or too hard. Usually, one cannot skip ahead or go back as is possible with the paper-based
examination. Friedrich (2008) noted that CBT enables educators and trainers to
author, schedule, deliver and report on surveys, quizzes, tests and exams. It
could be a stand-alone system or a part of a virtual learning environment,
possibly accessed via the World Wide Web. In addition to the examination
itself, CBT takes care of other related activities that interact with the
assessment such as test administration, setting questions and automated
marking. Computers are used by candidates to conduct their examinations online,
usually in the form of multiple choice questions, submit and get immediate
results. Examinations, in this context, refer to tests which aim to determine
the ability of a student or a prospective candidate into an institution of
learning; which are usually written tests, sometimes with practical
components. Assessment needs to be taken
as a very vital component of the educational process because one of the
challenges facing educational institutions today is the conduct of examinations
resulting in valid and reliable scores.
1.3 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
Regardless
of the improved use of CBT, there is still an extensive disappointment with
their implementation and performance. Hence, the main purpose of this study is to about encouragement in using CBT for
evaluating students in colleges of education.
1.4 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The research work is restricted to Computer Based Test on the
following subjects: C, C++ and Java for any school. The procedure involves a
student registering by filling a form(which contains First name, Last name,
Matric No., School, Semester, Email and Password) for signing in, reading the
examination rule, selecting one of the
subject, attempting the question, after finishing these, the result is
then released thereby showing whether the student is eligible or not.
1.5 AIMS
AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
In
this paper, a unified, scalable and flexible CBT system that addresses the
aforementioned limitations of the some existing e-examination systems is
developed. The conceptual design including the Data Flow Diagram (DFD), for the
system developed is also presented. Java
scripting language, Microsoft Access 2012 and Window 2007 are the tools used
for the development of the CBT system. The result of the user assessment survey
of the CBT system conducted indicates the registering, setting, conducting and
grading examination as well as generating and managing results become highly
time-efficient, less prone to human error, more secured and at the comfort of
both the lecturers and the students; thus preferred over the existing platforms
for conducting examination.
An online assessment however, is expected to offer several
advantages for the institution and the learner. These include (Andrew et al,
2009):
Ø Time analysis of responses to the question level to better
discriminate between candidates including video in questions, particularly for
scenarios in authentic assessment.
Ø Adaptive testing, where the next question to be posed is
determined by prior response(s).
Ø Question banks and randomization of questions and response
orders to reduce cheating.
Ø Automated analysis of results from entire candidate cohorts.
Ø Immediate feedback can be given
1.6 SIGNIFICANT OF THE STUDY
At the achievement of the study it is hoped that the
findings of this research will provide an insight into implementation of using
CBT in accessing both refreshers and staylites i.e post jamb and general course
in colleges of education.
1.7 DEFINITION OF TERMS
The
following definitions were presented to enable the reader to understand the
terms used in the study.
1.
Computer: - A computer is
a general purpose device that can be programmed to carry out a finite set of arithmetic or logical
operations. Since a sequence of operations can be readily changed, the computer
can solve more than one kind of problem.
2.
Assessment: - Assessment is the systematic collection, review and use of
information about educational programs to improve student learning. Assessment focuses on what students know,
what they are able to do, and what values they have when they graduate.
Assessment is concerned with the collective impact of a program on student
learning.
3.
Evaluation: - Evaluation offers a way to determine
whether an initiative has been worthwhile in terms of delivering what was
intended and expected. However, good evaluation can also answer other important
questions
4.
Test: - a procedure intended to establish
the quality, performance, or reliability of something.
5.
Computer based assessment (CBA):- Computer based assessment (CBA) is
the various electronics methods used in the assessment and evaluation of the
progress of the learners during the course of a study. It can be used to;
·
Delivers exam
questions to the candidate
·
Receives answers
from the candidate
·
Marks answers as
correct or incorrect
·
Totals marks
achieved within a whole assessment session
·
Gives immediate
results - pass or fail.
6.
Information communication Technology:- ICT (information and communications
technology - or technologies) is an umbrella term that includes any
communication device or application, encompassing: radio, television, cellular
phones, computer and network hardware and software, satellite systems and so
on, as well as the various services and applications associated with them, such
as videoconferencing and distance learning. ICTs are often spoken of in a
particular context, such as ICTs in education, health care, or libraries.
7.
Technology based assessment (TBA):- Technology-based assessment
techniques are powerful tools for improving teaching and learning. Schools are
increasingly using these techniques for more timely, relevant and personalized
teaching. These educational technologies help teachers develop students'
literacy, learning and thinking skills.
8.
Computer base technology (CBT):- It is a method of administering
tests in which the responses are electronically recorded, assessed, or both.
9.
Performance assessment; Performance assessment is a method of teaching and
learning that involves both process and product. It is not just a testing
strategy. Performance assessment tasks involve students in constructing various
types of products for diverse audiences. Students also are involved in
developing the process that leads to the finished product. Performance
assessment measures what students can do with what they know, rather than how
much they know. Performance assessment tasks are based on what is most
essential in the curriculum and what is interesting to a student.
Please read our return policy
No Review Found.
Optimum Linkup
67
Total Item
Login To Comment